《新月》雜志以及聚集在《新月》雜志周圍的群體——《新月》社同人（新月派），在文學(xué)上、思想上都有重要的建樹，在中國思想史上扮演了重要的角色，選編《新月》相關(guān)文章組成的《<新月>時論》一書有其不可替代的文化價值和思想、學(xué)術(shù)價值。正如謝泳在《逝去的年代》（文化藝術(shù)出版社，1999，第257頁）中所言：“他們當(dāng)年所主張的一切，并沒有隨著時間的推移而失去價值，而且恰恰是他們的這種思想在嚴(yán)密的禁錮下，成為整個中國知識分子的主要思想來源。”《新月》1928年創(chuàng)刊，1933年6月終刊（最后一期為第四卷第七期），在當(dāng)時以文藝上的先鋒和政治上的敢言而著稱，而影響最大的，莫過于1929年從人權(quán)角度、對國民黨訓(xùn)政的批判。當(dāng)時發(fā)表的文章，一部分由胡適輯為《人權(quán)論集》，1930年新月書店出版；一部分由羅隆基匯為《政治論文》，1931年同樣由新月書店出版。本書所選除已收入兩書的文章外，還包括未收入的《新月》的其他政論文章，以及左右兩翼對《新月》言論的批判文章。
作者簡介：
選編者邵建，現(xiàn)為南京曉莊學(xué)院文學(xué)院教授。自20世紀(jì)90年代后期起，邵建開始從事知識分子研究，以胡適與魯迅為個案，從思想史角度作胡、魯比較研究及胡適研究。著有《瞧，這人——日記、書信與年譜中的胡適》、《知識分子與人文》、《文學(xué)與現(xiàn)代性批判》等。
目錄：
編選者言·························································邵建／001正編：《人權(quán)論集》小序·································································胡適／005人權(quán)與約法···························································胡適／006《人權(quán)與約法》的討論·································胡適汪羽軍諸青來／012我們什么時候才可有憲法？·············································胡適／016論人權(quán)·······························································羅隆基／022論思想統(tǒng)一···························································梁實秋／038告壓迫言論自由者·····················································羅隆基／045附：《各級學(xué)校教職員研究黨義暫行條例》·····································／056新文化運(yùn)動與國民黨···················································胡適／057知難，行亦不易·······················································胡適／068專家政治·····························································羅隆基／079名教·································································胡適／087續(xù)編：《政治論文》及其他我對黨務(wù)上的“盡情批評”··············································羅隆基／099孫中山先生論自由·····················································梁實秋／110我們走哪條路？·······················································胡適／118汪精衛(wèi)論思想統(tǒng)一·····················································羅隆基／130論共產(chǎn)主義···························································羅隆基／133我們要財政管理權(quán)·····················································羅隆基／148《汪精衛(wèi)先生最近言論集》··············································羅隆基／154《政治思想之變遷》····················································羅隆基／159我的被捕的經(jīng)過與反感·················································羅隆基／163服從的危險·············································H.J.Laski著羅隆基譯／175約法與憲法···························································魯參／187政治家的態(tài)度·························································魯參／189平等的呼吁················································拉斯基著羅隆基譯／191人權(quán)不能留在約法里···················································努生／204總統(tǒng)問題·····························································努生／207上海民會選舉·························································努生／209對訓(xùn)政時期約法的批評·················································羅隆基／212國民會議的開幕詞·····················································努生／225我們不主張?zhí)熨x人權(quán)···················································努生／228論中國的共產(chǎn)·························································羅隆基／235“人權(quán)”釋疑·························································努生／230答葉秋原教授·························································羅隆基／235什么是法治···························································羅隆基／238告日本國民和中國的當(dāng)局···············································羅隆基／250附編（一）：右翼對胡適的圍剿胡適之揩揩眼鏡···················································近視眼同志／267匕首·································································德徵／268附：《陳局長的匕首》························································／269本市三區(qū)第三次全區(qū)代表大會議決案···········································／250呈請撤懲中國公學(xué)校長胡適···················································／271胡適之最近幾篇文章···················································滄波／272贊美的圣經(jīng)···························································何來／275胡適之的反動與迷夢···················································和尚／277中公校長胡適反動有據(jù)·······················································／279市執(zhí)委議懲胡適之·····················································老神／280平市百余黨員請查辦前善后會議委員胡適·······································／281津市黨委請懲辦胡適·························································／282關(guān)于胡適之最近之胡說·················································玉菱／283蘇省黨部呈請中央緝辦無聊文人胡適···········································／285有憲法才能訓(xùn)政嗎·····················································無任／286嚴(yán)懲豎儒胡適·······························································／289國府令飭教部警告胡適·······················································／290事由：“該校長言論不合，奉令警告”··········································／291附：胡適致蔣夢麟··························································／293論《人權(quán)論集》后胡說博士可以休矣···································陳九皋／294談所謂“言論自由”····················································胡漢民／297好大膽的月刊·······························································／301附編（二）：左翼對《新月》的批判爭自由與胡適的胡說···················································依然／305無題·······································································／307評胡適之的《我們走那條路》············································某生者／309新月社批評家的任務(wù)···················································魯迅／311“硬譯”與“文學(xué)的階級性”·············································魯迅／312“好政府主義”························································魯迅／326知難行難·····························································魯迅／328王道詩話·····················································瞿秋白魯迅／330出賣靈魂的秘訣···············································瞿秋白魯迅／332言論自由的界限·······················································魯迅／334中國人權(quán)派的真面目···················································瞿秋白／336
出版說明································································／351前言前言
20世紀(jì)20年代末，國民黨統(tǒng)一全國后，遵照孫中山生前制定的“軍政、訓(xùn)政、憲政”的建國道路，決定在全國范圍內(nèi)結(jié)束軍政，實行訓(xùn)政。但國民黨訓(xùn)政的實質(zhì)在于搞一黨專制，因此，自1929年上半年起，以胡適、羅隆基為代表的新月派從人權(quán)角度對國民黨訓(xùn)政進(jìn)行了尖銳批判，這是一場帶有強(qiáng)烈憲政訴求的“人權(quán)運(yùn)動”，它揭開了20世紀(jì)中國自由主義知識分子與執(zhí)政黨沖突的歷史第一幕。
當(dāng)時文章全部發(fā)表在上�！缎略隆冯s志上，遂使這份著名的文學(xué)雜志染上了強(qiáng)烈的政論色彩。1929—1931年的“人權(quán)論戰(zhàn)”以1930年為界，前此為第一階段，相關(guān)文章由胡適輯為一冊，名為《人權(quán)論集》，由新月書店出版。此后為第二階段，文章由羅隆基編為一冊，名為《政治論文》，亦由新月書店出版。為盡可能再現(xiàn)當(dāng)年“人權(quán)運(yùn)動”風(fēng)貌，我們將《人權(quán)論集》、《政治論文》以及未收入這兩本書的《新月》其他論文輯為一冊，以志紀(jì)念。
“人權(quán)運(yùn)動”在當(dāng)時產(chǎn)生了強(qiáng)烈反響，它不但遭到作為政治右翼的國民黨的圍剿，也遭遇魯迅、瞿秋白等文化左翼的批判。本書特意收錄一些左右兩方的文本，以為資料或供讀者一觀。
前言20世紀(jì)20年代末，國民黨統(tǒng)一全國后，遵照孫中山生前制定的“軍政、訓(xùn)政、憲政”的建國道路，決定在全國范圍內(nèi)結(jié)束軍政，實行訓(xùn)政。但國民黨訓(xùn)政的實質(zhì)在于搞一黨專制，因此，自1929年上半年起，以胡適、羅隆基為代表的新月派從人權(quán)角度對國民黨訓(xùn)政進(jìn)行了尖銳批判，這是一場帶有強(qiáng)烈憲政訴求的“人權(quán)運(yùn)動”，它揭開了20世紀(jì)中國自由主義知識分子與執(zhí)政黨沖突的歷史第一幕。當(dāng)時文章全部發(fā)表在上�！缎略隆冯s志上，遂使這份著名的文學(xué)雜志染上了強(qiáng)烈的政論色彩。1929—1931年的“人權(quán)論戰(zhàn)”以1930年為界，前此為第一階段，相關(guān)文章由胡適輯為一冊，名為《人權(quán)論集》，由新月書店出版。此后為第二階段，文章由羅隆基編為一冊，名為《政治論文》，亦由新月書店出版。為盡可能再現(xiàn)當(dāng)年“人權(quán)運(yùn)動”風(fēng)貌，我們將《人權(quán)論集》、《政治論文》以及未收入這兩本書的《新月》其他論文輯為一冊，以志紀(jì)念�！叭藱�(quán)運(yùn)動”在當(dāng)時產(chǎn)生了強(qiáng)烈反響，它不但遭到作為政治右翼的國民黨的圍剿，也遭遇魯迅、瞿秋白等文化左翼的批判。本書特意收錄一些左右兩方的文本，以為資料或供讀者一觀。邵建小序（《人權(quán)論集》）這幾篇文章討論的是中國今日人人應(yīng)該討論的一個問題——人權(quán)問題。前三篇討論人權(quán)與憲法。第四篇討論我們要的是什么人權(quán)。第五六篇討論人權(quán)中的一個重要部分——思想和言論的自由。第七篇討論國民黨中的反動思想，希望國民黨的反省。第八篇討論孫中山的知難行易說。這兩篇只是“思想言論自由”的實例：因為我們所要建立的是批評國民黨的自由和批評孫中山的自由。上帝我們尚且可以批評，何況國民黨與孫中山？第九篇與第十篇討論政治上兩個根本問題，收在這里做個附錄。周櫟園《書影》里有一則很有意味的故事：“昔有鸚武飛集陀山。山中大火，鸚武遙見，入水濡羽，飛而灑之�！疤焐裱裕骸疇栯m有志意，何足云也？’對曰：‘嘗僑居是山，不忍見耳�！苯袢照谴蠡鸬臅r候，我們骨頭燒成灰終究是中國人，實在不忍袖手旁觀。我們明知小小的翅膀上滴下的水點未必能救火，我們不過盡我們的一點微弱的力量，減少良心上的一點譴責(zé)而已。十八，十二，十三，胡適
|
